- The Key Takeaways
- How the Simone Biles–Charlie Kirk Fake Blog Post Went Viral
- Debunking the Hoax: Fact Checking the Simone Biles Post and Charlie Kirk Claims
- Conspiracy Theories, QAnon, and the Deep State: Why People Believe This Stuff
- The Real Dangers of AI-Generated Fake News about Simone Biles Post
- Frequently Asked Questions
Did Simone Biles clap back at Charlie Kirk from beyond the grave with some brutal blog post? Nope. She never wrote a single word about Charlie Kirk after his death, and the so-called “blog” blowing up on Facebook is 100% fake, cooked up by AI clickbait factories.
But that didn’t stop the internet from eating it up like it was gospel truth.
I’ve been around long enough to know how this game works—mix a little bit of real history (Kirk trashing Biles back in 2021) with some spicy AI-generated nonsense, and boom, you’ve got a viral hoax. It’s the perfect recipe for chaos on social media, and people are too busy rage-sharing to stop and fact-check.
That’s why I’m breaking this down. You’ll see how the fake post spread, why people fell for it, and why AI-fueled lies like this are only going to get messier.
Buckle up, because this one’s a wild ride through the foolish corner of the internet.
The Key Takeaways
- Simone Biles never wrote a blog about Charlie Kirk
- Viral posts used AI to mix old insults with fake new claims
- AI-driven hoaxes show how fast misinformation spreads online
How the Simone Biles–Charlie Kirk Fake Blog Post Went Viral
This whole mess kicked off with a sloppy Facebook post. It spread like wildfire because people love drama and got juiced up by AI garbage that looked real enough to fool half the internet.
Mix in old beef between Biles and Kirk, and you’ve got the perfect recipe for a digital food fight.
The Simone Biles Post That Started the Chaos
It all began with a random Facebook post claiming Simone Biles wrote a blog trashing Charlie Kirk after his assassination. Spoiler: she didn’t.
But the post had all the right clickbait ingredients—her name, his death, and a juicy headline.
The fake blog link looked sketchy as hell, but that didn’t stop people from hitting “share” like it was gospel. Some even thought it came from Yahoo News because the AI-generated article copied the style of legit outlets.
I’ve seen plenty of fake news scams, but this one was next level. It wasn’t just a bad meme or a troll tweet—it was a full-on fake article with fake quotes and fake reactions.
And Facebook’s algorithm, being the dumpster fire it is, shoved it in front of millions.
Why People Fell for the Hoax So Fast
People bought it because the story was just believable enough. Biles and Kirk had history.
Back in 2021, Kirk called her a “cruel” when she bailed at the Tokyo Olympics. So when the fake blog popped up, folks thought, yeah, she’d totally clap back now.
Add in the fact that most people don’t read past the headline, and boom—you’ve got a viral lie. The kicker? Nobody could find the actual blog, but that didn’t matter.
Screenshots and reposts gave it legs. By the time fact-checkers stepped in, the lie had already sprinted across the internet like Usain Bolt.
Role of AI in Fueling the Confusion about Simone Biles Post
This wasn’t just some dude in his basement making memes. AI played a huge role. The fake blog was AI-written, which is why it looked polished enough to trick casual readers. It even tossed in dramatic phrases like “shockwaves through sports and politics” to sound legit.
AI is basically the new intern for fake news hustlers. It cranks out endless content that looks professional but has zero truth.
That’s why so many people thought this was a real Biles blog—it read like something you’d see on a news site, even though it was total trash.
And let’s be real, Big Tech doesn’t care. Facebook makes money off clicks, not accuracy.
So the AI junk gets boosted, fact-checks get buried, and we’re stuck sorting through the nonsense.
Debunking the Hoax: Fact Checking the Simone Biles Post and Charlie Kirk Claims
The internet loves a fake scandal, and this one was tailor-made for chaos. A viral Facebook post claimed Simone Biles unloaded on Charlie Kirk in a blog after his death.
Spoiler: it never happened, and the receipts prove it.
No, Simone Biles Didn’t Write That Blog
Let’s get this straight—Simone Biles never wrote a single word about Charlie Kirk after his death. I checked her website, her Instagram, her TikTok, even her dusty old Facebook page.
Nothing. Zero. Nada. The bogus “blog” was pure fan fiction, pumped out by some troll who probably thinks AI equals journalism. Fact checkers dug in and confirmed there’s no trace of Biles dropping a “tell-all” about Kirk.
If you search Google News or Yahoo News archives, you’ll find exactly what I found: crickets. The whole thing was a cheap viral stunt, and people fell for it because drama sells.
Charlie Kirk’s Real Response (If Any)
Here’s the kicker—Charlie Kirk never even got the chance to respond to this nonsense. The man was shot and killed on September 10, 2025.
You can’t clap back from the grave, no matter how many Twitter warriors pretend otherwise.
The only real history between Kirk and Biles dates back to 2021. That’s when Kirk ripped her for bailing on Olympic events, calling her a “disgrace.”
Harsh? Yeah. But that was years ago, and it never escalated beyond the usual media outrage cycle.
So if you’re wondering whether Kirk left some spicy rebuttal, the answer is no.
The feud was old news, and this “blog post” was nothing but a ghost story made up to juice clicks.
Fact Checkers and Media Reactions
Fact checkers had a field day with this one. Outlets like Lead Stories and Newsweek quickly flagged the post as fake.
They pulled receipts, archived sources, and showed that Biles’s accounts were clean. The media reaction was predictable: some folks screamed “cover-up,” others cried about “fake news,” and the rest of us just rolled our eyes.
If you believed Simone Biles suddenly became a political blogger, that’s on you.
The lesson? Always check before you share.
If you see a viral post screaming about a celebrity rant, odds are it’s cooked up by some guy in his mom’s basement with ChatGPT open.
What the ACLU and Others Had to Say
The ACLU didn’t directly weigh in on the Biles-Kirk hoax, but groups like them usually jump in when misinformation starts spinning.
They tend to frame it as a free speech issue—like, “people have the right to say foolish stuff, but platforms need to flag lies.”
Some commentators argued that hoaxes like this hurt actual debate. Instead of talking about Kirk’s real political legacy or Biles’s athletic career, we’re stuck fact-checking fake blogs.
And honestly, I get it. I’d rather argue about weed legalization or the latest OnlyFans scandal than waste time proving a gymnast didn’t post a ghost blog about a dead conservative.
But hey, this is the internet—fake news is the business model.
Conspiracy Theories, QAnon, and the Deep State: Why People Believe This Stuff
People don’t just wake up one morning and decide Simone Biles is secretly ghostwriting blog posts for Charlie Kirk. These wild stories grow out of the same swamp that gave us QAnon Reddit threads, satanic daycare panics in the 80s, and Facebook memes about the Beatles being replaced by clones.
How QAnon and the Deep State Fuel Outrage
QAnon is like the Marvel Cinematic Universe for people who think Reddit comments are classified intel. The “deep state” becomes their Thanos—an evil hidden government pulling strings, stealing elections, and eating Chick-fil-A in secret basements.
I’ve seen how this stuff spreads. Someone posts a vague claim like “Trust the plan” or “The storm is coming”, and suddenly your aunt is texting you at 2 a.m. about Hillary Clinton’s ankle monitor.
The outrage machine works because it’s simple: blame everything bad on a shadowy cabal. Gas prices? Deep state. Bad NFL call? Deep state.
Simone Biles writing Charlie Kirk blogs? Obviously, deep state.
It’s foolish, but it’s sticky. People love a villain, and “deep state” is the ultimate catch-all boogeyman.
Satanic Panic, Committee of 300, and Other Wild Claims
Back in the 80s, America lost its mind over “satanic panic.” Parents thought heavy metal bands and Dungeons & Dragons were prepping kids for goat sacrifices.
Spoiler: they weren’t. Now, swap out Ozzy Osbourne for TikTok influencers, and you’ve got the same recycled panic.
The Committee of 300—a supposed secret group of elites running the world—gets dragged into these conversations too. It’s like the Illuminati but with worse branding.
The satanic panic never really died. It just got Wi-Fi.
QAnon fans still think Hollywood elites are drinking baby blood like it’s a pre-workout shake. And yeah, it sounds confusing, but people eat it up because it makes them feel like insiders in some secret club.
From Beatles to MS13: Viral Conspiracies on Social Media
Conspiracy theories aren’t picky. They’ll latch onto anyone from the Beatles to MS13.
Remember the rumor that Paul McCartney died in 1966 and got swapped with a lookalike? Boom—instant viral legend.
Fast forward, and now Facebook pushes fake posts about gangs like MS13 secretly running U.S. cities. Mix in AI-generated nonsense, and suddenly Simone Biles is writing Charlie Kirk blogs from her burner laptop.
Social media makes this worse because it rewards Amazing. The wilder the claim, the more clicks it gets.
Truth is boring. Lies with a little spice? That’s shareable.
It’s why your cousin believes memes more than CNN. And honestly, after watching CNN lately, I don’t even blame him.
The Real Dangers of AI-Generated Fake News about Simone Biles Post
AI isn’t just making goofy cat pics anymore—it’s pumping out fake stories that look real enough to fool your grandma, your boss, and half your Facebook feed.
From bogus celebrity blogs to fake political scandals, this tech is turning lies into clickbait gold.
How AI Supercharges Disinformation
AI doesn’t sleep, doesn’t get drunk, and sure as hell doesn’t fact-check. It can crank out hundreds of fake news articles faster than CNN can say “anonymous source.”
That means one reckless rumor can spread like wildfire across Facebook, TikTok, and X before anyone realizes it’s total BS.
The scariest part? These posts don’t look like the sketchy chain emails your uncle used to forward. They look polished—like legit news sites.
Toss in some AI-generated screenshots or fake “blogs,” and suddenly Simone Biles is writing about Charlie Kirk when she never typed a word.
For trolls and grifters, this is a dream. They don’t need talent, just a laptop and Wi-Fi. And the rest of us get stuck trying to figure out what’s real and what’s AI slop.
What the FBI is Doing About It
The FBI’s been warning people for years about “deepfakes” and AI scams. They keep dropping bulletins telling everyone to watch out for fake celebrity endorsements, fake porn, and those wild political ads that just feel off.
If something looks too wild to be true, it probably is. Trust your gut.
Let’s be real, the feds love using stuff like this as an excuse to clamp down on speech they don’t like. If you’re MAGA, you already know how that playbook goes.
They’ll call it “safety,” but it’s usually just about keeping control of the narrative. That’s just how it is.
Notorious Hoaxes: Miles Mathis, Larry Nassar, and Beyond
AI hoaxes aren’t random. They love drama and go straight for names that already get people talking.
Take Miles Mathis, for example. This conspiracy theorist has been accused of faking his own essays with AI-style nonsense before AI was even trendy.
Some folks argue he’s trolling. Others think he’s just off his rocker.
And then there’s Larry Nassar, the infamous gymnastics doctor. His name pops up in fake stories all the time because, let’s be honest, it guarantees attention.
AI tools recognize that. Toss a notorious name into the mix, and suddenly you’ve got garbage headlines that people can’t help but share.
Pick a famous name. Add a dash of outrage. Facebook’s algorithm takes it from there.
It’s basically the same scam recipe behind fake celebrity deaths, OnlyFans leaks, or those wild fake Trump arrest stories. Wild how people just keep falling for it, right?
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes — Simone Biles is a millionaire. Multiple sources estimate her net worth to be somewhere around US$17-20 million as of recent years.
No — there is no evidence that Simone Biles wrote a blog post about Charlie Kirk after his death, as claimed in some viral social media posts. That story has been debunked. The claim appears to be part of a misinformation/AI-generated story that spread on Facebook and other platforms.
In 2021, during the Tokyo Olympics, Simone Biles withdrew from several events citing mental health concerns (including issues sometimes referred to as “the twisties”).
In response, Charlie Kirk publicly criticized her harshly. Some of the things he said:
He called her a “selfish toxic.”, He also said she was “a shame to the country.”
He claimed in some statements that “we are raising a generation of weak people like Simone Biles.”
He criticized her decision to withdraw as, from his viewpoint, not showing up when it counted and letting down the country.
Disclosure | VICESNOB.com
VICESNOB.com is a censored, non-hosting informational directory. No explicit images, videos, or content appear on this website.
Content Neutrality Statement
VICESNOB.com is an informational, editorial, and search-index style platform that provides humorous commentary and curated listings of independently operated websites related to vices. We do not host, stream, embed, mirror, or display explicit content of any kind on this Website.
Read more
All thumbnails shown on VICESNOB.com are strictly non-explicit, censored previews intended solely for identification and editorial purposes. These images are automatically filtered and manually reviewed to ensure they do not contain inappropriate or explicit acts. No explicit images or videos appear anywhere on this Website.
Our role is content-neutral: we offer reviews, descriptions, and informational links in a manner comparable to search engines and online directories. We do not influence, control, or moderate the content of external websites, nor do we facilitate or circumvent any access restrictions or age-verification measures implemented by third-party platforms.
For regulatory purposes, VICESNOB.com operates solely as an informational directory and commentary resource and should not be classified as a content provider or content host.
1. Age Requirement:
Visitors to VICESNOB.com must be 18 years or older. Explicitly, minors are not permitted to use or access our website. We reserve the right to request proof of age from any user and to deny access to any user who does not meet this requirement.
2. Parental Control, Filtering, and RTA Label:
VICESNOB.com is committed to preventing minors from accessing inappropriate content. To reinforce this commitment, our website is labeled with the Restricted To Adults (RTA) label, a system recognized for helping parents and guardians restrict access to age-inappropriate content. Parents or guardians concerned about minors accessing VICESNOB.com or sites reviewed therein are strongly encouraged to use parental control software, services, or filtering systems that recognize the RTA label to restrict access.
3. Fictional Persona Notification:
We want to emphasize that the character of ‘VICESNOB’ portrayed in our reviews is entirely fictional and should not be mistaken for a real person. The portrayal of ‘VICESNOB’ as a vice-obsessed character who claims to know everything about vices is intended to be a satirical and humorous representation of the vice-related industry. Please note that the reviews and opinions expressed on VICESNOB are presented in a fictional manner and should not be taken literally. It’s crucial to understand that ‘VICESNOB’ is a fictional persona created for entertainment purposes.
4. Content Diversity and Feedback:
We value diversity and strive to provide a wide range of perspectives in our reviews. With over 14,000+ VICESNOB reviews written by multiple writers over the past 10 years, our platform benefits from the unique styles and viewpoints of our diverse team of authors. This diversity contributes to the overall content variety and ensures a more engaging experience for our users. However, we understand that humor can be subjective, and if you encounter an offensive joke or any other issues, we sincerely apologize and encourage you to provide feedback. Your valuable input helps us improve our content and ensures a more enjoyable experience for all users.
5. Review Authenticity:
The reviews on VICESNOB.com represent the subjective opinions of their respective writers. They should not be considered as definitive evaluations of the websites discussed. The views and opinions expressed on this platform are purely those of the authors.
6. Endorsement Clarification:
A review or mention of a website does not constitute an endorsement of all content, actions, or policies of said site.
7. Updates and Errors:
While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, the content of reviewed websites might change after our assessment, or there might be unintentional inaccuracies in our content. We do not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information presented.
8. Localization and Geo-Blocked Content:
Users should be aware that certain websites reviewed on VICESNOB.com may implement geo-restrictions, meaning access to specific content could vary based on the user’s geographical location. We have no control over these restrictions, and user experiences may differ depending on regional policies. If you are considering using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) for privacy or browsing purposes, we recommend reviewing the terms and conditions of any third-party site before doing so. Some platforms explicitly prohibit VPN usage, and bypassing geo-restrictions may violate their policies. For general VPN recommendations, see VICESNOB’s Best VPN Sites category. Always ensure you comply with the applicable terms of service and local laws before using a VPN.
9. Content Hosting and Linkback Clarification:
VICESNOB.com does not host, stream, or provide direct access to explicit content. We are an independent review platform that offers editorial commentary and informational overviews of websites for the benefit of users.
Our role is solely to provide users with unbiased reviews and information to help them make informed decisions about websites and services.
10. Third-Party Links and Non-Affiliation:
Some reviewed websites may include backlinks to VICESNOB.com as part of reciprocal, unpaid link exchange arrangements. These are standard internet practices and do not imply financial relationships, endorsements, or collaborative control. VICESNOB.com is not responsible for the actions, policies, or content of any site that links to us. Presence of our link on another website does not signify involvement in, or approval of, any content or conduct on that site, whether explicit or otherwise.
We have no control over how or where third-party websites display our link, especially when placed automatically or sitewide. If our link appears on pages referencing trademarked content, it is incidental and does not reflect any targeted placement, sponsorship, or intent to associate with such material.
11. Content Authenticity & Age Verification:
All content producers and platforms reviewed on VICESNOB.com are believed to comply with age and content verification processes in accordance with international laws. However, we cannot guarantee or verify the age of all persons depicted in content from external websites.
11A. Age Verification Clarification:
VICESNOB.com is a review and informational platform. We do not host, stream, or distribute any explicit content. Instead, we provide editorial commentary, humorous reviews, and informational links to third-party websites that operate independently of our platform.
Each review may include a censored thumbnail (typically a single preview of the external site’s homepage), a short written overview, and a direct link to the homepage of the third-party website. We do not link directly to videos, content pages, explicit material, or user-generated content. Thumbnails are filtered and manually moderated to ensure they do not display inappropriate or explicit acts.
While some of the external sites we review may be subject to age verification laws in specific jurisdictions (e.g., Texas H.B. 1181 or similar legislation), VICESNOB.com is not a content provider and is therefore not subject to commercial age verification obligations.
Users who choose to visit external sites via VICESNOB do so voluntarily and are solely responsible for complying with any age verification requirements or access restrictions imposed by those third-party websites and their respective local laws.
12. Fair Use of Thumbnails:
We may automatically generate and include thumbnails of websites reviewed on VICESNOB for illustrative purposes in our reviews, typically a single preview of the homepage. These thumbnails are intended to offer visual context and help users better understand the website’s interface or features. We have implemented automated filters and manual checks to ensure that the thumbnails do not contain inappropriate content, explicit acts, or any other prohibited content to the best of our technological abilities.
However, due to the dynamic nature of external websites, we may not capture all changes or updates accurately. All rights to the original content, including any elements shown in thumbnails, remain with their respective owners. The use of such thumbnails is solely for editorial, identification, and review purposes and should not be interpreted as a claim of ownership, endorsement, or affiliation. If you believe that a thumbnail displayed on VICESNOB violates applicable laws or rights, please contact us promptly. We will investigate and, if necessary, remove or update the thumbnail to comply with legal requirements.
12A. Automated Thumbnail Moderation:
To ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards, VICESNOB.com uses automated filtering systems along with manual oversight to censor all thumbnails and preview images — including those appearing on review pages, category listings, and the VICESNOB Blog. These visuals are presented solely for identification, review, and editorial commentary. The inclusion of any thumbnail does not imply endorsement, affiliation, or a formal relationship with the external website. While we strive for accuracy and compliance, VICESNOB is a vast and continuously updated platform; occasional moderation oversights may occur. Any such instances are unintentional, and we welcome prompt reports so they can be reviewed and addressed accordingly.
13. Fair Use Declaration:
All third-party trademarks, brand names, logos, and other intellectual properties featured in the reviews on VICESNOB.com are owned by their respective holders. Their use on our website is intended purely for informational and review purposes under the doctrine of fair use. We do not claim any ownership over these trademarks and recognize their respective ownership. This includes our use of names and images in commentary and satire, including those related to public figures, content creators, or internet personalities, solely for editorial and review purposes in a transformative, non-commercial context.
14. Trademark Fair Use and Editorial Reference:
Inclusion of a trademarked name, brand, or likeness in any review or editorial reference is solely for identification, commentary, and review purposes. VICESNOB.com asserts its rights under applicable trademark fair use doctrines and does not claim affiliation, endorsement, or sponsorship by any trademark holder unless explicitly stated. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
15. Reporting Concerns and Content Issues:
If you encounter any issues or concerns regarding the content found on any of the reviewed sites listed on VICESNOB, we encourage you to take appropriate action. There are multiple ways to report such issues:
• Contact the respective site owner directly: You can reach out to the site owner or administrator of the specific website in question. They can address any concerns related to content, copyright infringement, or other issues that may arise.
• Contact their hosting company or domain registrar: In cases of severe violations or copyright infringement, it may be appropriate to report the issue to the hosting company or domain registrar of the website. They have procedures in place to handle such matters.
• Report the issue to us: If you prefer to report the issue to us directly, you can do so by sending an email or by using the report button located on the review page of the specific website. We appreciate your assistance in maintaining the integrity of our reviews and ensuring a safe browsing experience for our users.
16. Scope of Responsibility and Content Disclaimer:
Please be aware that VICESNOB.com’s primary responsibility is to provide comprehensive website reviews and assist users in making informed decisions about their online choices related to vices. However, we want to make it clear that we cannot address concerns related to specific content found on external websites. Our role is solely to review and provide information about these websites, and we do not have control over their content, actions, or any potential legal issues that may arise.
17. Limitations on Content Assurance and User Responsibility:
We want to highlight that we cannot guarantee the legality, accuracy, or safety of the content found on external websites. Due to the vast amount of available and newly added content, it is impossible for us to monitor all materials for potential infringements. We rely on user reports to assist us in maintaining the integrity of our reviews and ensuring a safe and enjoyable browsing experience for our users.
While we strive to make VICESNOB.com a safe place for users, we must emphasize that we cannot provide an absolute assurance. It is important to exercise personal discretion and judgment when accessing and using the reviewed websites. Users are responsible for complying with applicable laws and regulations, as well as ensuring their own safety and security while interacting with third-party websites.
18. Third-Party Interactions and External Links:
We make every effort to maintain the integrity of our website and provide accurate and reliable information. However, we want to make it clear that VICESNOB.com is not responsible for the actions, content, or any legal issues that may arise from your interactions with third-party websites. Users assume full responsibility for their own actions and the consequences that may result from accessing and using the reviewed websites.
Furthermore, we would like to clarify that VICESNOB.com is not responsible for any external links, third-party partner links, or advertisements found on the reviewed sites listed on our platform.
19. Ethical Consumption:
We encourage users to approach vice-related entertainment as responsible consumers. Piracy and unauthorized sharing harm content creators and industries.
20. Mental and Emotional Health:
Prolonged or excessive consumption of vice-related content can lead to potential addiction, affecting some individuals’ mental or emotional well-being. We encourage users to be mindful of their consumption habits and to seek guidance or counseling if they believe they’re developing an unhealthy relationship with such content. For those seeking community support and resources to combat addiction, you can visit relevant categories on VICESNOB.
21. Cultural Sensitivity:
Given the global accessibility of the internet, users are reminded that content reviewed or discussed may not align with everyone’s cultural or personal beliefs and norms. Discretion is advised.
22. Ethical Concerns:
VICESNOB acknowledges that the nature of our website may attract criticism or controversy from various individuals, groups, or activists. We strive to maintain an open and transparent platform for content reviews while adhering to legal and ethical standards. However, we recognize that opinions may differ, and some individuals or groups may hold different views regarding certain aspects of our reviews.
We are committed to engaging in constructive dialogue and addressing concerns in a respectful and professional manner. We encourage users and visitors to reach out to us directly with any questions, feedback, or criticisms they may have. We will make every effort to respond promptly and transparently.
23. Disputes and Resolution:
In the event of any disputes arising from the content on VICESNOB.com, we prefer an amicable resolution and are open to dialogue, mediation, and other non-litigious methods of dispute resolution.
24. Protection of Brand Integrity and Legal Stance:
We understand that VICESNOB.com may attract various opinions and reactions. While we respect freedom of expression and constructive criticism, we will not tolerate defamation, harassment, or malicious actions against our brand or team.
