Megan Prescott, who played Katie Finch across 16 episodes of Skins, says she’s now earned three times more from OnlyFans than she made during her entire run on the Channel 4 show — and she had just £300 to her name when she signed up.
Key Takeaways
- Prescott joined OnlyFans in 2020, during the pandemic, while working a zero-hours job at a distillery.
- She says her total OnlyFans earnings are now three times what Skins paid her across her time on the show.
- Skins actors reportedly earned close to minimum wage — around £400 a week — despite the show’s cult status.
- Prescott charges £11 (about $14) a month on OnlyFans and says she’s still actively pursuing acting.
- She predicts more mainstream actors will move toward creator-run platforms like OFTV rather than relying on studio contracts alone.
What Happened
Prescott told The Sun that she joined OnlyFans in 2020 with £300 in her bank account, after years of trying to make her acting career work. In a separate interview with Cosmopolitan, she said she’s “treated better on OnlyFans than I was on Skins” — a line that’s been circulating since the story broke.
The financial comparison is the headline. Prescott says her OnlyFans income now sits at roughly three times her total Skins earnings, a gap she attributes partly to how little the show actually paid its young cast. “We worked it out by the hour once, and it was minimum wage,” she said, adding that £400 a week felt like a fortune to a 16-year-old but doesn’t hold up well in hindsight — especially since, per Prescott, the original Skins contracts included no streaming residuals.
She now charges £11 a month for subscriber content and says the shift changed more than her bank balance. “Going on OnlyFans and realising all this content that I was making for free, people would pay for… just changed my entire point of view,” she said, framing the move as a creative reset rather than a retirement from acting.
Public Response to Megan Prescott OnlyFans Earnings
Reaction has mostly split two ways. One camp is treating this as another data point in a now-familiar pattern — actors from cult 2000s British shows revealing they were underpaid relative to the fame those shows generated. The other is focused on the OnlyFans number itself, since a straightforward “3x my TV salary” claim from a recognizable actress travels fast on social platforms regardless of the platform being discussed.
Metro noted this story landed alongside at least two similar ones this month: a former WWE performer saying she earns more on OnlyFans than she ever did wrestling, and a 90s Baywatch actress joining the platform at 56. That clustering is itself part of the story — this isn’t an isolated headline, it’s a pattern showing up across TV, wrestling, and film talent within the same few weeks.
Megan Prescott OnlyFans and Her Skins Background
Skins ran as a defining Channel 4 drama in the 2000s, and Prescott starred as Katie Finch alongside her twin sister Kathryn, who played Emily. Prescott has previously said the show “sexualised” her as a teenager — she was 16 when she filmed explicit scenes opposite a much older actor, a criticism she’s raised in prior interviews well before this latest round of coverage.
That history matters here because it reframes her OnlyFans move as something closer to reclaiming control than a simple pivot for money. She’s said she still wants industry-standard acting work, but that OnlyFans — and platforms like OFTV, which hosts creator-made video content outside the traditional studio system — gives her a version of creative ownership her TV contract never did.
ViceSnob’s Take on Megan Prescott OnlyFans Earnings
Strip away the “Skins star” headline hook and the underlying pattern here isn’t new to anyone who follows the creator economy closely: mid-tier entertainment income has been flat or shrinking for years, streaming residuals for older UK shows are notoriously thin, and OnlyFans doesn’t require a studio’s approval to monetize an existing audience. What’s changed is how openly actors are now willing to put real numbers next to their old TV paychecks. A “3x my salary” claim from a recognizable face is a much stickier headline than the usual “creator earns six figures” story, and that’s exactly why it’s spreading the way it has this week.
Worth flagging the obvious caveat: Prescott’s figures are self-reported, not independently verified against tax filings or platform payout data, which is standard for stories like this across the industry. Treat the number as directionally credible rather than audited fact.
Curious how creators like Prescott compare to the platform’s biggest earners? Browse our full Creator Database → to see verified profile data across hundreds of accounts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. She’s said she’s continuing to pursue acting work and views OnlyFans as something that gives her creative freedom alongside it, not a replacement for it.
She charges £11 per month (roughly $14) for subscriber content, according to her interview with The Sun.
In 2020, during the pandemic, while she was working a zero-hours contract job at a distillery.
It appears to be. Within the same month, Metro also reported on a former WWE performer earning more on OnlyFans than she did wrestling, and a Baywatch actress joining the platform at 56 — suggesting more established entertainment names are treating OnlyFans as a legitimate income stream rather than a last resort.
She’s said cast pay worked out to roughly minimum wage per hour, with no streaming residuals built into the original contracts — a common complaint from actors on shows produced before streaming residual structures became standard.
Keep Reading
- Best Celebrity OnlyFans Influencers: Famous Faces Cashing In and Breaking the Internet
- American Pie Star Shannon Elizabeth Joins OnlyFans
- Drea De Matteo Made $75,000 in 75 Minutes on OnlyFans
- Is OnlyFans Worth It? An Honest Guide Before You Subscribe
- Browse more: Culture | OnlyFans Complete Guide
Leave a comment