James Fishback, the Florida gubernatorial candidate who proposed a 50% “sin tax” on OnlyFans earnings and publicly claimed creator Sophie Rain would owe the state $42 million under it, finished third in Tuesday’s GOP primary with just 10.5% of the vote. Rain, a Tampa-based creator who says she’s earned more than $100 million from OnlyFans since 2023, told the New York Post on Wednesday she’s “very happy to be keeping my money.”
What Happened
Fishback, a 31-year-old former investor, ran for the Florida GOP gubernatorial nomination on a platform that included a 50% tax specifically targeting OnlyFans and adult-content earnings. He floated the proposal in January 2026, calling it a mechanism to “disincentivize and deter” the adult content industry, and named Sophie Rain specifically in an X post, claiming she’d owe Florida $42 million under it. Rain called the proposal “the irrational thing I’ve ever heard” at the time.
Tuesday’s primary results ended that plan. Trump-endorsed Rep. Byron Donalds won the nomination outright with 47.8% of the vote, beating Lt. Gov. Jay Collins (25.2%). Fishback placed third with 10.5%, trailing former state House Speaker Paul Renner (8.5%) for a distant finish. He did not immediately respond to the Post’s request for comment.
Fishback’s proposed 50% OnlyFans tax ended with his campaign after he won just 10.5% of Tuesday’s Florida GOP primary vote, per Florida election results reported by the New York Post on August 19, 2026.
Public Response and Industry Reaction
Rain, 23, responded directly to the Post following the results:
- “I never believed voters were going to support singling out women and punishing them for doing completely legal work, so yes, I’m very happy to be keeping my money.”
- “[Fishback] wanted to take 50% of my income because he didn’t approve of how I make my living, and now he got about 10% of the vote.”
- “I’ve never had a problem with paying my fair share” — Rain says she already pays millions in taxes monthly.
- “What I had a problem with was a politician deciding that people like me deserved a special ‘sin tax’ because he personally disapproved of our careers.”
Rain also pushed back on the framing of the proposal as fiscally motivated: “If you want to raise teachers’ salaries or pay for kids’ lunches, I’m all for that — but come up with a serious policy instead of using women and content creators as a political punching bag.”
Sophie Rain’s public response framed the primary loss as a rejection of Fishback’s tax proposal specifically, not just his broader campaign — a distinction she made in multiple separate statements to the Post.
Background and Context
Rain is a co-founder and member of the Bop House, a Florida-based content creator compound that its members say generates a combined $15 million per month across its roughly eight residents. She’s been publicly reported as one of OnlyFans’ highest earners since her breakout in 2023, and her earnings — real or estimated — have made her a recurring reference point in conversations about adult creator income, including ViceSnob’s earlier coverage of her earnings claims.
Fishback framed his proposed tax around concerns about “young women” being drawn into adult content work, according to comments he made to NXR Studios in January. Critics, including Rain, characterized the proposal as targeting a legal industry over personal disapproval rather than a genuine revenue mechanism, noting adult creators already pay standard federal and state taxes like any other self-employed earner.
The proposed tax targeted OnlyFans and adult-content earnings specifically rather than adjusting broader state tax policy, which is the core distinction Rain and other creators objected to throughout the campaign.
Career and Platform History
Rain’s public profile grew rapidly in 2023 and 2024 around viral social content, and her OnlyFans earnings claims — including a widely circulated figure crossing $100 million — have made her one of the platform’s most recognized names.
This is the second time in 2026 Rain has publicly responded to Fishback’s proposal, first dismissing it in January and again after his primary loss, making her one of the most consistently vocal creator critics of the plan throughout the election cycle.
ViceSnob’s Take
A targeted tax on one specific, legal industry was always a harder sell than a generic revenue plan, and Tuesday’s results back that up — Fishback finished third out of eleven candidates. Byron Donalds, the Trump-endorsed winner, didn’t campaign on anything resembling Fishback’s proposal. Florida Republican primary voters simply weren’t looking for an adult-industry culture war fight this cycle.
Fishback’s proposal is part of a broader wave of scrutiny facing the creator platform, from proposed taxes to OnlyFans legal battles in 2026.
The bigger story isn’t Sophie Rain’s tax bill. It’s that creator-specific tax proposals keep surfacing in state politics as OnlyFans earnings become impossible to ignore as an economic category — and keep failing when voters get an actual say. Expect this playbook to resurface elsewhere; it just didn’t work in Florida.
Curious how Rain’s earnings stack up against other top creators? Browse our full Creator Database for verified profiles across the platform.
Fishback’s campaign is over, but the underlying policy debate about how creator-economy earnings should be taxed isn’t going anywhere. The next attempt at this kind of proposal will likely come from a state where the adult content industry has a smaller public relations counterweight than Florida’s Bop House creators turned out to have.
FAQ
Q: Did James Fishback’s proposed OnlyFans tax pass?
A: No. The 50% “sin tax” was a campaign proposal, not enacted policy, and it ended when Fishback lost the Florida GOP gubernatorial primary on August 18, 2026.
Q: How much did Fishback claim Sophie Rain would owe under his tax plan?
A: Fishback claimed in a January 2026 X post that Rain would owe Florida $42 million in taxes under his proposed 50% tax on OnlyFans earnings.
Q: Who won the Florida GOP gubernatorial primary?
A: Trump-endorsed Rep. Byron Donalds won with 47.8% of the vote, defeating Lt. Gov. Jay Collins (25.2%) and James Fishback (10.5%), among others.
Q: How much has Sophie Rain reportedly earned from OnlyFans?
A: Rain says she has earned more than $100 million from OnlyFans since 2023, a figure she has publicly repeated, including in her response to Fishback’s primary loss.
Disclosure | VICESNOB.com
VICESNOB.com is a censored, non-hosting informational directory. No explicit images, videos, or content appear on this website.
Content Neutrality Statement
VICESNOB.com is an informational, editorial, and search-index style platform that provides humorous commentary and curated listings of independently operated websites related to vices. We do not host, stream, embed, mirror, or display explicit content of any kind on this Website.
Read more
All thumbnails shown on VICESNOB.com are strictly non-explicit, censored previews intended solely for identification and editorial purposes. These images are automatically filtered and manually reviewed to ensure they do not contain inappropriate or explicit acts. No explicit images or videos appear anywhere on this Website.
Our role is content-neutral: we offer reviews, descriptions, and informational links in a manner comparable to search engines and online directories. We do not influence, control, or moderate the content of external websites, nor do we facilitate or circumvent any access restrictions or age-verification measures implemented by third-party platforms.
For regulatory purposes, VICESNOB.com operates solely as an informational directory and commentary resource and should not be classified as a content provider or content host.
1. Age Requirement:
Visitors to VICESNOB.com must be 18 years or older. Explicitly, minors are not permitted to use or access our website. We reserve the right to request proof of age from any user and to deny access to any user who does not meet this requirement.
2. Parental Control, Filtering, and RTA Label:
VICESNOB.com is committed to preventing minors from accessing inappropriate content. To reinforce this commitment, our website is labeled with the Restricted To Adults (RTA) label, a system recognized for helping parents and guardians restrict access to age-inappropriate content. Parents or guardians concerned about minors accessing VICESNOB.com or sites reviewed therein are strongly encouraged to use parental control software, services, or filtering systems that recognize the RTA label to restrict access.
3. Fictional Persona Notification:
We want to emphasize that the character of ‘VICESNOB’ portrayed in our reviews is entirely fictional and should not be mistaken for a real person. The portrayal of ‘VICESNOB’ as a vice-obsessed character who claims to know everything about vices is intended to be a satirical and humorous representation of the vice-related industry. Please note that the reviews and opinions expressed on VICESNOB are presented in a fictional manner and should not be taken literally. It’s crucial to understand that ‘VICESNOB’ is a fictional persona created for entertainment purposes.
4. Content Diversity and Feedback:
We value diversity and strive to provide a wide range of perspectives in our reviews. With over 14,000+ VICESNOB reviews written by multiple writers over the past 10 years, our platform benefits from the unique styles and viewpoints of our diverse team of authors. This diversity contributes to the overall content variety and ensures a more engaging experience for our users. However, we understand that humor can be subjective, and if you encounter an offensive joke or any other issues, we sincerely apologize and encourage you to provide feedback. Your valuable input helps us improve our content and ensures a more enjoyable experience for all users.
5. Review Authenticity:
The reviews on VICESNOB.com represent the subjective opinions of their respective writers. They should not be considered as definitive evaluations of the websites discussed. The views and opinions expressed on this platform are purely those of the authors.
6. Endorsement Clarification:
A review or mention of a website does not constitute an endorsement of all content, actions, or policies of said site.
7. Updates and Errors:
While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, the content of reviewed websites might change after our assessment, or there might be unintentional inaccuracies in our content. We do not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information presented.
8. Localization and Geo-Blocked Content:
Users should be aware that certain websites reviewed on VICESNOB.com may implement geo-restrictions, meaning access to specific content could vary based on the user’s geographical location. We have no control over these restrictions, and user experiences may differ depending on regional policies. If you are considering using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) for privacy or browsing purposes, we recommend reviewing the terms and conditions of any third-party site before doing so. Some platforms explicitly prohibit VPN usage, and bypassing geo-restrictions may violate their policies. For general VPN recommendations, see VICESNOB’s Best VPN Sites category. Always ensure you comply with the applicable terms of service and local laws before using a VPN.
9. Content Hosting and Linkback Clarification:
VICESNOB.com does not host, stream, or provide direct access to explicit content. We are an independent review platform that offers editorial commentary and informational overviews of websites for the benefit of users.
Our role is solely to provide users with unbiased reviews and information to help them make informed decisions about websites and services.
10. Third-Party Links and Non-Affiliation:
Some reviewed websites may include backlinks to VICESNOB.com as part of reciprocal, unpaid link exchange arrangements. These are standard internet practices and do not imply financial relationships, endorsements, or collaborative control. VICESNOB.com is not responsible for the actions, policies, or content of any site that links to us. Presence of our link on another website does not signify involvement in, or approval of, any content or conduct on that site, whether explicit or otherwise.
We have no control over how or where third-party websites display our link, especially when placed automatically or sitewide. If our link appears on pages referencing trademarked content, it is incidental and does not reflect any targeted placement, sponsorship, or intent to associate with such material.
11. Content Authenticity & Age Verification:
All content producers and platforms reviewed on VICESNOB.com are believed to comply with age and content verification processes in accordance with international laws. However, we cannot guarantee or verify the age of all persons depicted in content from external websites.
11A. Age Verification Clarification:
VICESNOB.com is a review and informational platform. We do not host, stream, or distribute any explicit content. Instead, we provide editorial commentary, humorous reviews, and informational links to third-party websites that operate independently of our platform.
Each review may include a censored thumbnail (typically a single preview of the external site’s homepage), a short written overview, and a direct link to the homepage of the third-party website. We do not link directly to videos, content pages, explicit material, or user-generated content. Thumbnails are filtered and manually moderated to ensure they do not display inappropriate or explicit acts.
While some of the external sites we review may be subject to age verification laws in specific jurisdictions (e.g., Texas H.B. 1181 or similar legislation), VICESNOB.com is not a content provider and is therefore not subject to commercial age verification obligations.
Users who choose to visit external sites via VICESNOB do so voluntarily and are solely responsible for complying with any age verification requirements or access restrictions imposed by those third-party websites and their respective local laws.
12. Fair Use of Thumbnails:
We may automatically generate and include thumbnails of websites reviewed on VICESNOB for illustrative purposes in our reviews, typically a single preview of the homepage. These thumbnails are intended to offer visual context and help users better understand the website’s interface or features. We have implemented automated filters and manual checks to ensure that the thumbnails do not contain inappropriate content, explicit acts, or any other prohibited content to the best of our technological abilities.
However, due to the dynamic nature of external websites, we may not capture all changes or updates accurately. All rights to the original content, including any elements shown in thumbnails, remain with their respective owners. The use of such thumbnails is solely for editorial, identification, and review purposes and should not be interpreted as a claim of ownership, endorsement, or affiliation. If you believe that a thumbnail displayed on VICESNOB violates applicable laws or rights, please contact us promptly. We will investigate and, if necessary, remove or update the thumbnail to comply with legal requirements.
12A. Automated Thumbnail Moderation:
To ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards, VICESNOB.com uses automated filtering systems along with manual oversight to censor all thumbnails and preview images — including those appearing on review pages, category listings, and the VICESNOB Blog. These visuals are presented solely for identification, review, and editorial commentary. The inclusion of any thumbnail does not imply endorsement, affiliation, or a formal relationship with the external website. While we strive for accuracy and compliance, VICESNOB is a vast and continuously updated platform; occasional moderation oversights may occur. Any such instances are unintentional, and we welcome prompt reports so they can be reviewed and addressed accordingly.
13. Fair Use Declaration:
All third-party trademarks, brand names, logos, and other intellectual properties featured in the reviews on VICESNOB.com are owned by their respective holders. Their use on our website is intended purely for informational and review purposes under the doctrine of fair use. We do not claim any ownership over these trademarks and recognize their respective ownership. This includes our use of names and images in commentary and satire, including those related to public figures, content creators, or internet personalities, solely for editorial and review purposes in a transformative, non-commercial context.
14. Trademark Fair Use and Editorial Reference:
Inclusion of a trademarked name, brand, or likeness in any review or editorial reference is solely for identification, commentary, and review purposes. VICESNOB.com asserts its rights under applicable trademark fair use doctrines and does not claim affiliation, endorsement, or sponsorship by any trademark holder unless explicitly stated. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
15. Reporting Concerns and Content Issues:
If you encounter any issues or concerns regarding the content found on any of the reviewed sites listed on VICESNOB, we encourage you to take appropriate action. There are multiple ways to report such issues:
• Contact the respective site owner directly: You can reach out to the site owner or administrator of the specific website in question. They can address any concerns related to content, copyright infringement, or other issues that may arise.
• Contact their hosting company or domain registrar: In cases of severe violations or copyright infringement, it may be appropriate to report the issue to the hosting company or domain registrar of the website. They have procedures in place to handle such matters.
• Report the issue to us: If you prefer to report the issue to us directly, you can do so by sending an email or by using the report button located on the review page of the specific website. We appreciate your assistance in maintaining the integrity of our reviews and ensuring a safe browsing experience for our users.
16. Scope of Responsibility and Content Disclaimer:
Please be aware that VICESNOB.com’s primary responsibility is to provide comprehensive website reviews and assist users in making informed decisions about their online choices related to vices. However, we want to make it clear that we cannot address concerns related to specific content found on external websites. Our role is solely to review and provide information about these websites, and we do not have control over their content, actions, or any potential legal issues that may arise.
17. Limitations on Content Assurance and User Responsibility:
We want to highlight that we cannot guarantee the legality, accuracy, or safety of the content found on external websites. Due to the vast amount of available and newly added content, it is impossible for us to monitor all materials for potential infringements. We rely on user reports to assist us in maintaining the integrity of our reviews and ensuring a safe and enjoyable browsing experience for our users.
While we strive to make VICESNOB.com a safe place for users, we must emphasize that we cannot provide an absolute assurance. It is important to exercise personal discretion and judgment when accessing and using the reviewed websites. Users are responsible for complying with applicable laws and regulations, as well as ensuring their own safety and security while interacting with third-party websites.
18. Third-Party Interactions and External Links:
We make every effort to maintain the integrity of our website and provide accurate and reliable information. However, we want to make it clear that VICESNOB.com is not responsible for the actions, content, or any legal issues that may arise from your interactions with third-party websites. Users assume full responsibility for their own actions and the consequences that may result from accessing and using the reviewed websites.
Furthermore, we would like to clarify that VICESNOB.com is not responsible for any external links, third-party partner links, or advertisements found on the reviewed sites listed on our platform.
19. Ethical Consumption:
We encourage users to approach vice-related entertainment as responsible consumers. Piracy and unauthorized sharing harm content creators and industries.
20. Mental and Emotional Health:
Prolonged or excessive consumption of vice-related content can lead to potential addiction, affecting some individuals’ mental or emotional well-being. We encourage users to be mindful of their consumption habits and to seek guidance or counseling if they believe they’re developing an unhealthy relationship with such content. For those seeking community support and resources to combat addiction, you can visit relevant categories on VICESNOB.
21. Cultural Sensitivity:
Given the global accessibility of the internet, users are reminded that content reviewed or discussed may not align with everyone’s cultural or personal beliefs and norms. Discretion is advised.
22. Ethical Concerns:
VICESNOB acknowledges that the nature of our website may attract criticism or controversy from various individuals, groups, or activists. We strive to maintain an open and transparent platform for content reviews while adhering to legal and ethical standards. However, we recognize that opinions may differ, and some individuals or groups may hold different views regarding certain aspects of our reviews.
We are committed to engaging in constructive dialogue and addressing concerns in a respectful and professional manner. We encourage users and visitors to reach out to us directly with any questions, feedback, or criticisms they may have. We will make every effort to respond promptly and transparently.
23. Disputes and Resolution:
In the event of any disputes arising from the content on VICESNOB.com, we prefer an amicable resolution and are open to dialogue, mediation, and other non-litigious methods of dispute resolution.
24. Protection of Brand Integrity and Legal Stance:
We understand that VICESNOB.com may attract various opinions and reactions. While we respect freedom of expression and constructive criticism, we will not tolerate defamation, harassment, or malicious actions against our brand or team.
Leave a comment