California just pulled another political stunt, and honestly, I’m not even shocked anymore. Proposition 50—the so-called “redistricting reform”—passed, handing Gavin Newsom and his sugar daddies a brand new power map. Prop 50 has certainly stirred up plenty of controversy.
Prop 50 passed in California, giving Newsom and his backers, including a fat $10 million check from George Soros, the green light to redraw congressional districts in their favor. You don’t have to be some Fox News junkie to see what’s happening here—it’s the same old rigged game, just with a fresh coat of “fairness” paint.
I watched the results come in like a rerun of a bad sitcom. The campaign raised about $70 million, and—big surprise—Soros’s cash led the charge. They tried to sell it as a way to “balance” Texas’s gerrymandering, but let’s be real—this was about locking down blue seats before the 2026 midterms.
California’s elections have become a high-stakes poker game, and the house always wins. If you think this is just a California problem, you’re missing the bigger play.
What happens here sets the tone for the rest of the country. The “fix” isn’t just local—it’s spreading faster than OnlyFans leaks on Twitter.
The Key Takeaways
- Prop 50 passed, giving Newsom control over California’s redistricting.
- Soros’ $10 million donation made him the biggest funder of the campaign.
- The move could shape national politics heading into the 2026 midterms.
Prop 50: The Wildest Ballot Measure in California History
California just pulled off one of the most expensive and politically charged redistricting stunts ever. Prop 50 passed, giving Democrats power to redraw congressional maps mid-decade—and trust me, that’s not normal.
The money trail, the timing, and the big-name donors all scream political theater wrapped in Silicon Valley cash.
What Is Proposition 50 and Why Should You Care?
Prop 50 might sound like Ambien until you realize it changes who controls Congress seats. It lets California’s Democrat-run government redraw district lines again, even though the maps were already set after the 2020 Census.
It’s like changing the rules halfway through the game because your team’s losing. Voters approved it in a special election after Gov. Gavin Newsom went full-court press for it.
He called it a “fairness” move, but come on—it’s about stacking the deck for Democrats in 2026. The campaign torched over $140 million, making it one of California’s priciest ballot fights ever.
Supporters claimed it would “protect democracy.” Opponents called it “a power grab with a smiley face.” Either way, it permanently rewires how elections work in the bluest state in America.
How Prop 50 Hijacks California’s Redistricting
California used to brag about its “independent” redistricting commission. That’s toast now.
Prop 50 hands the map-making pen back to politicians—mostly Democrats. The new lines tilt several districts left, putting at least five Republican-held seats on the chopping block.
Here’s the quick and dirty:
- Before Prop 50: Citizen commission drew the lines.
- After Prop 50: Lawmakers loyal to Newsom draw the lines.
- Winners: Democrats.
- Losers: GOP incumbents and anyone who actually liked fair maps.
Critics say this is textbook gerrymandering. Supporters call it “course correction.” I call it what it is—political engineering dressed up as reform.
It’s like watching the dealer reshuffle mid-hand… and somehow always dealing aces to the same side. How convenient, right?
Who’s Really Behind Prop 50? Follow the Money
When I see a $120 million campaign, my first question is: who’s paying for this circus? The usual suspects show up—Hollywood donors, Silicon Valley billionaires, and groups linked to George Soros and the Open Society Foundations.
Newsom’s PAC vacuumed up massive checks from progressive mega-donors who bankroll similar “voting reform” scams nationwide. It’s not a conspiracy; it’s just politics at billionaire scale.
Follow the cash and you’ll find it snaking through layers of nonprofits and committees before exploding into TV ads and mailbox spam. Meanwhile, regular Californians are left wondering why their vote feels like a bad reality show audition.
If democracy’s for sale, Prop 50 just set a new record price tag. Welcome to the big leagues, baby.
Prop 50 Power Grab: Gavin Newsom & Soros Under Fire
California politics just went full Hollywood again. Gov. Gavin Newsom pulled off another high-dollar stunt with the help of billionaire George Soros and his deep-pocketed crew.
The result? Proposition 50—a redistricting plan that tilts the state’s congressional map blue and flexes the muscle of elite donors over everyday voters. If you’re not pissed, you’re not paying attention.
Newsom’s $70 Million War Chest: Soros Bucks & Union Cash
You know it’s serious when a governor’s campaign looks more like a Marvel movie budget. Newsom’s team raked in about $70 million to push Proposition 50.
$10 million came straight from George Soros, the Democratic financier who’s never seen a left-wing cause he didn’t want to bankroll. Add in the usual suspects—public sector unions, Hollywood donors, and Silicon Valley execs—and you’ve got a political money pit that could drown out any opposition.
I’m all for competition, but this looks more like a monopoly on influence. Even Newsom himself reportedly told donors to “stop giving.” That’s like a bartender cutting you off after your twelfth shot—too late, buddy, you’re already face-down on the bar.
How the Soros Family Became California’s Puppet Masters
The Soros family doesn’t just toss cash around for fun. Through groups tied to Open Society Foundations, they’ve built a political machine that shapes everything from district maps to prosecutor races.
In California, their $10 million donation made them the largest single funders of the redistricting push. That kind of money doesn’t just buy ads—it buys access.
When Soros-backed groups fund your campaign, you’re not exactly hitting “ignore” on their calls. It’s like having your landlord also be your roommate—you’re never really in charge, are you?
Here’s the kicker: Soros’s influence stretches way beyond California. His network quietly backs “reform” candidates and ballot measures nationwide, always under the banner of “democracy.” Funny how democracy always seems to mean more power for them. Coincidence? I doubt it.
Prop 50 Clash: Newsom vs. Trump in Power Showdown
Let’s get real—Proposition 50 wasn’t about “fairness.” It was about Donald Trump. Newsom pitched it as a moral crusade to stop Trump’s supposed “gerrymandering,” but the plan conveniently helps Democrats lock down more House seats heading into 2026.
Polls showed most Californians didn’t even understand the measure, yet it passed after a flood of pro-Newsom ads featuring Obama and Elizabeth Warren. That’s not grassroots—it’s AstroTurf, and it smells like it.
The move cements Newsom’s national ambitions. He’s already teasing a 2028 presidential run, and this power grab gives him the narrative he needs: “I saved democracy.” Give me a break.
When billionaires and governors redraw the map to keep themselves in power, democracy’s the last thing being saved. It’s like watching a bank robber call himself a security guard.
Election Results, Polls, and the Redistricting Circus
California’s Prop 50 vote turned into a full-blown circus. The state’s redistricting measure didn’t just tweak lines on a map—it flipped the script on who holds power in Congress and showed just how far Gov. Gavin Newsom will go to stack the deck for his party.
Did Prop 50 Pass? Breaking Down the Results
Yeah, Prop 50 passed—barely, but enough for Democrats to pop champagne. The measure gives Newsom and his crew the green light to redraw California’s congressional districts mid-decade. That’s a big deal because it overrides the so-called “independent” redistricting commission until after 2030.
Election Night Snapshot:
| Category | Result |
|---|---|
| Yes on Prop 50 | ~52% |
| No on Prop 50 | ~48% |
| Turnout | Around 60% of registered voters |
Five Republican districts are now basically toast. The new maps pack in more Democratic voters, making it almost impossible for GOP candidates to survive.
It’s like watching someone change the rules of the game halfway through—and then acting like it’s “fair.” Sure, and Hunter Biden’s laptop was just a “Russian hoax,” right?
Prop 50 Results: How Californians Really Voted
Polls leading up to Election Day showed a tight race, with independents holding all the cards. Democrats pushed hard with ads about “representation” and “equity,” while Republicans warned about one-party control.
Turnout was wild in urban counties—Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Alameda—where blue votes stacked up like weed gummies at Coachella. Rural areas and the Central Valley leaned red but just couldn’t close the gap.
Most voters I talked to had no clue what Prop 50 actually did. The ballot language sounded harmless, but the fine print handed more power to Sacramento elites. Classic California politics: confuse the voters, then call it democracy. It’s like a magic trick, but your wallet disappears.
Gerrymandering, Republican Districts, and the Fallout
Prop 50’s passage means California just joined the mid-decade redistricting club—usually reserved for red states like Texas. The twist? Democrats did it this time, and the media suddenly called it “reform.” Hilarious, right?
Republican lawmakers are furious. They say the new map could cost them up to five House seats in 2026. That’s not chump change—it could flip the entire U.S. House.
The fallout’s already gone national. Red states are doubling down on their own maps, and lawsuits are flying faster than campaign ads. I’ll say it straight: this isn’t about fairness. It’s about power, and California just reminded everyone who’s running the show.
National Shockwaves: Texas, Trump, and the 2026 Midterms
The next big political brawl is already heating up. Texas is flexing red-state muscle, Trump’s back in the ring, and Democrats like Newsom are scrambling to keep control of their blue fortresses.
What’s happening now could decide who runs Congress after the 2026 midterms—and maybe who runs the whole damn country. Buckle up, America. The circus is just getting started.
Texas Throws Down: Abbott, GOP, and the Red State Playbook
Texas isn’t just holding the line—it’s building a freakin’ wall around it. Governor Greg Abbott and the Texas Legislature are redrawing congressional maps, and honestly, they’re about to lock in GOP power for a decade.
Democrats are screaming “gerrymander” like it’s a new swear word, but Abbott’s just playing the same dirty game they ran in California. Let’s not act shocked.
In Austin, Republicans treat every district like it’s the last beer at a tailgate. They’re cutting backroom deals, carving up boundaries, and making damn sure rural voters don’t get steamrolled by those urban blue mobs.
This is chess, not checkers, and Abbott’s slamming his pieces down like he’s on a Red Bull bender.
Key moves so far:
- New redistricting proposal adds GOP-friendly seats—because why not?
- Election laws tightened on mail-in ballots and ID checks. No more “oops, I lost my ID” excuses.
- Abbott’s base fired up by Trump’s Truth Social rants hyping up Texas. MAGA hats everywhere, folks.
Look, Texas is showing the rest of the red states how to throw elbows and win without begging D.C. for a hall pass. That’s just facts.
Prop 50 Revenge: Newsom Moves to Cancel Texas Wins
Meanwhile, Gavin Newsom is out in California, turning the place into a Democrat fortress with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer. He’s got redistricting, ballot shenanigans, and enough media spin to make you dizzy.
Newsom’s trying to cancel out Texas’s momentum, plain and simple. Political trench warfare, baby—one side tightens elections, the other hands out ballots like candy until “participation” starts looking a whole lot like fraud.
His crew’s working overtime to make sure California ships a full blue clown car to the House of Representatives in 2026. They call it “protecting democracy,” but let’s not kid ourselves—it’s about locking down power.
California’s playbook:
- Mail-in voting made permanent statewide. Because apparently, nobody owns a car in LA.
- Voter roll reviews basically banned to avoid “disenfranchisement.” Translation: Let the dead vote.
- Progressive PACs (Soros bucks, obviously) dumping cash into “voter outreach.” Sure, Jan.
So here we are. Texas builds walls, California builds loopholes. Every damn election cycle. Who’s shocked?
What’s Next for U.S. Elections? The 2026 Showdown
The 2026 midterms are shaping up to be the nastiest political bloodbath since 2020. President Trump is already firing up the MAGA machine, teasing rallies, and dropping not-so-subtle hints on Truth Social about “taking back the House.”
Democrats whine that it’s all fearmongering, but let’s be real—voters are eating it up like free wings at Hooters. If red states like Texas keep their maps and blue states like California keep their machines, we’re all buckled in for a coast-to-coast demolition derby.
The middle of America—Ohio, Arizona, Georgia—will end up playing kingmaker. Who’s gonna walk away with Congress? I’d put my money on the GOP’s ground game, especially with Trump’s comeback tour steamrolling through town.
Buckle up, buttercup. With lawsuits flying, recounts looming, and cable news anchors sweating through their spray tans, the 2026 midterms could make 2020 look like a middle school student council election. Cheers, VICESNOB.
Frequently Asked Questions
Proposition 50 is a 2025 California constitutional amendment that would temporarily suspend the current independent commission’s congressional-district boundaries and allow the state legislature to adopt new maps for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections.
A “YES” vote means California would begin using new, legislatively-drawn congressional district maps starting in 2026 instead of sticking with the maps drawn by the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission until after the 2030 Census.
A “NO” vote means California would continue using the current congressional-district maps drawn by the independent commission until after the next redistricting cycle following the 2030 Census, and the state legislature would not draw interim maps.
The main opposition comes from Republicans and critics who argue that Prop 50 amounts to a partisan power grab by Democrats, undermines the independent commission system, and may lead to gerrymandered maps favoring one party.
Proposition 50 passed by a wide margin in the November 4, 2025 special election, with projections showing around 63-65% of voters in favor.
Disclosure | VICESNOB.com
VICESNOB.com is a censored, non-hosting informational directory. No explicit images, videos, or content appear on this website.
Content Neutrality Statement
VICESNOB.com is an informational, editorial, and search-index style platform that provides humorous commentary and curated listings of independently operated websites related to vices. We do not host, stream, embed, mirror, or display explicit content of any kind on this Website.
Read more
All thumbnails shown on VICESNOB.com are strictly non-explicit, censored previews intended solely for identification and editorial purposes. These images are automatically filtered and manually reviewed to ensure they do not contain inappropriate or explicit acts. No explicit images or videos appear anywhere on this Website.
Our role is content-neutral: we offer reviews, descriptions, and informational links in a manner comparable to search engines and online directories. We do not influence, control, or moderate the content of external websites, nor do we facilitate or circumvent any access restrictions or age-verification measures implemented by third-party platforms.
For regulatory purposes, VICESNOB.com operates solely as an informational directory and commentary resource and should not be classified as a content provider or content host.
1. Age Requirement:
Visitors to VICESNOB.com must be 18 years or older. Explicitly, minors are not permitted to use or access our website. We reserve the right to request proof of age from any user and to deny access to any user who does not meet this requirement.
2. Parental Control, Filtering, and RTA Label:
VICESNOB.com is committed to preventing minors from accessing inappropriate content. To reinforce this commitment, our website is labeled with the Restricted To Adults (RTA) label, a system recognized for helping parents and guardians restrict access to age-inappropriate content. Parents or guardians concerned about minors accessing VICESNOB.com or sites reviewed therein are strongly encouraged to use parental control software, services, or filtering systems that recognize the RTA label to restrict access.
3. Fictional Persona Notification:
We want to emphasize that the character of ‘VICESNOB’ portrayed in our reviews is entirely fictional and should not be mistaken for a real person. The portrayal of ‘VICESNOB’ as a vice-obsessed character who claims to know everything about vices is intended to be a satirical and humorous representation of the vice-related industry. Please note that the reviews and opinions expressed on VICESNOB are presented in a fictional manner and should not be taken literally. It’s crucial to understand that ‘VICESNOB’ is a fictional persona created for entertainment purposes.
4. Content Diversity and Feedback:
We value diversity and strive to provide a wide range of perspectives in our reviews. With over 14,000+ VICESNOB reviews written by multiple writers over the past 10 years, our platform benefits from the unique styles and viewpoints of our diverse team of authors. This diversity contributes to the overall content variety and ensures a more engaging experience for our users. However, we understand that humor can be subjective, and if you encounter an offensive joke or any other issues, we sincerely apologize and encourage you to provide feedback. Your valuable input helps us improve our content and ensures a more enjoyable experience for all users.
5. Review Authenticity:
The reviews on VICESNOB.com represent the subjective opinions of their respective writers. They should not be considered as definitive evaluations of the websites discussed. The views and opinions expressed on this platform are purely those of the authors.
6. Endorsement Clarification:
A review or mention of a website does not constitute an endorsement of all content, actions, or policies of said site.
7. Updates and Errors:
While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, the content of reviewed websites might change after our assessment, or there might be unintentional inaccuracies in our content. We do not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information presented.
8. Localization and Geo-Blocked Content:
Users should be aware that certain websites reviewed on VICESNOB.com may implement geo-restrictions, meaning access to specific content could vary based on the user’s geographical location. We have no control over these restrictions, and user experiences may differ depending on regional policies. If you are considering using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) for privacy or browsing purposes, we recommend reviewing the terms and conditions of any third-party site before doing so. Some platforms explicitly prohibit VPN usage, and bypassing geo-restrictions may violate their policies. For general VPN recommendations, see VICESNOB’s Best VPN Sites category. Always ensure you comply with the applicable terms of service and local laws before using a VPN.
9. Content Hosting and Linkback Clarification:
VICESNOB.com does not host, stream, or provide direct access to explicit content. We are an independent review platform that offers editorial commentary and informational overviews of websites for the benefit of users.
Our role is solely to provide users with unbiased reviews and information to help them make informed decisions about websites and services.
10. Third-Party Links and Non-Affiliation:
Some reviewed websites may include backlinks to VICESNOB.com as part of reciprocal, unpaid link exchange arrangements. These are standard internet practices and do not imply financial relationships, endorsements, or collaborative control. VICESNOB.com is not responsible for the actions, policies, or content of any site that links to us. Presence of our link on another website does not signify involvement in, or approval of, any content or conduct on that site, whether explicit or otherwise.
We have no control over how or where third-party websites display our link, especially when placed automatically or sitewide. If our link appears on pages referencing trademarked content, it is incidental and does not reflect any targeted placement, sponsorship, or intent to associate with such material.
11. Content Authenticity & Age Verification:
All content producers and platforms reviewed on VICESNOB.com are believed to comply with age and content verification processes in accordance with international laws. However, we cannot guarantee or verify the age of all persons depicted in content from external websites.
11A. Age Verification Clarification:
VICESNOB.com is a review and informational platform. We do not host, stream, or distribute any explicit content. Instead, we provide editorial commentary, humorous reviews, and informational links to third-party websites that operate independently of our platform.
Each review may include a censored thumbnail (typically a single preview of the external site’s homepage), a short written overview, and a direct link to the homepage of the third-party website. We do not link directly to videos, content pages, explicit material, or user-generated content. Thumbnails are filtered and manually moderated to ensure they do not display inappropriate or explicit acts.
While some of the external sites we review may be subject to age verification laws in specific jurisdictions (e.g., Texas H.B. 1181 or similar legislation), VICESNOB.com is not a content provider and is therefore not subject to commercial age verification obligations.
Users who choose to visit external sites via VICESNOB do so voluntarily and are solely responsible for complying with any age verification requirements or access restrictions imposed by those third-party websites and their respective local laws.
12. Fair Use of Thumbnails:
We may automatically generate and include thumbnails of websites reviewed on VICESNOB for illustrative purposes in our reviews, typically a single preview of the homepage. These thumbnails are intended to offer visual context and help users better understand the website’s interface or features. We have implemented automated filters and manual checks to ensure that the thumbnails do not contain inappropriate content, explicit acts, or any other prohibited content to the best of our technological abilities.
However, due to the dynamic nature of external websites, we may not capture all changes or updates accurately. All rights to the original content, including any elements shown in thumbnails, remain with their respective owners. The use of such thumbnails is solely for editorial, identification, and review purposes and should not be interpreted as a claim of ownership, endorsement, or affiliation. If you believe that a thumbnail displayed on VICESNOB violates applicable laws or rights, please contact us promptly. We will investigate and, if necessary, remove or update the thumbnail to comply with legal requirements.
12A. Automated Thumbnail Moderation:
To ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards, VICESNOB.com uses automated filtering systems along with manual oversight to censor all thumbnails and preview images — including those appearing on review pages, category listings, and the VICESNOB Blog. These visuals are presented solely for identification, review, and editorial commentary. The inclusion of any thumbnail does not imply endorsement, affiliation, or a formal relationship with the external website. While we strive for accuracy and compliance, VICESNOB is a vast and continuously updated platform; occasional moderation oversights may occur. Any such instances are unintentional, and we welcome prompt reports so they can be reviewed and addressed accordingly.
13. Fair Use Declaration:
All third-party trademarks, brand names, logos, and other intellectual properties featured in the reviews on VICESNOB.com are owned by their respective holders. Their use on our website is intended purely for informational and review purposes under the doctrine of fair use. We do not claim any ownership over these trademarks and recognize their respective ownership. This includes our use of names and images in commentary and satire, including those related to public figures, content creators, or internet personalities, solely for editorial and review purposes in a transformative, non-commercial context.
14. Trademark Fair Use and Editorial Reference:
Inclusion of a trademarked name, brand, or likeness in any review or editorial reference is solely for identification, commentary, and review purposes. VICESNOB.com asserts its rights under applicable trademark fair use doctrines and does not claim affiliation, endorsement, or sponsorship by any trademark holder unless explicitly stated. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
15. Reporting Concerns and Content Issues:
If you encounter any issues or concerns regarding the content found on any of the reviewed sites listed on VICESNOB, we encourage you to take appropriate action. There are multiple ways to report such issues:
• Contact the respective site owner directly: You can reach out to the site owner or administrator of the specific website in question. They can address any concerns related to content, copyright infringement, or other issues that may arise.
• Contact their hosting company or domain registrar: In cases of severe violations or copyright infringement, it may be appropriate to report the issue to the hosting company or domain registrar of the website. They have procedures in place to handle such matters.
• Report the issue to us: If you prefer to report the issue to us directly, you can do so by sending an email or by using the report button located on the review page of the specific website. We appreciate your assistance in maintaining the integrity of our reviews and ensuring a safe browsing experience for our users.
16. Scope of Responsibility and Content Disclaimer:
Please be aware that VICESNOB.com’s primary responsibility is to provide comprehensive website reviews and assist users in making informed decisions about their online choices related to vices. However, we want to make it clear that we cannot address concerns related to specific content found on external websites. Our role is solely to review and provide information about these websites, and we do not have control over their content, actions, or any potential legal issues that may arise.
17. Limitations on Content Assurance and User Responsibility:
We want to highlight that we cannot guarantee the legality, accuracy, or safety of the content found on external websites. Due to the vast amount of available and newly added content, it is impossible for us to monitor all materials for potential infringements. We rely on user reports to assist us in maintaining the integrity of our reviews and ensuring a safe and enjoyable browsing experience for our users.
While we strive to make VICESNOB.com a safe place for users, we must emphasize that we cannot provide an absolute assurance. It is important to exercise personal discretion and judgment when accessing and using the reviewed websites. Users are responsible for complying with applicable laws and regulations, as well as ensuring their own safety and security while interacting with third-party websites.
18. Third-Party Interactions and External Links:
We make every effort to maintain the integrity of our website and provide accurate and reliable information. However, we want to make it clear that VICESNOB.com is not responsible for the actions, content, or any legal issues that may arise from your interactions with third-party websites. Users assume full responsibility for their own actions and the consequences that may result from accessing and using the reviewed websites.
Furthermore, we would like to clarify that VICESNOB.com is not responsible for any external links, third-party partner links, or advertisements found on the reviewed sites listed on our platform.
19. Ethical Consumption:
We encourage users to approach vice-related entertainment as responsible consumers. Piracy and unauthorized sharing harm content creators and industries.
20. Mental and Emotional Health:
Prolonged or excessive consumption of vice-related content can lead to potential addiction, affecting some individuals’ mental or emotional well-being. We encourage users to be mindful of their consumption habits and to seek guidance or counseling if they believe they’re developing an unhealthy relationship with such content. For those seeking community support and resources to combat addiction, you can visit relevant categories on VICESNOB.
21. Cultural Sensitivity:
Given the global accessibility of the internet, users are reminded that content reviewed or discussed may not align with everyone’s cultural or personal beliefs and norms. Discretion is advised.
22. Ethical Concerns:
VICESNOB acknowledges that the nature of our website may attract criticism or controversy from various individuals, groups, or activists. We strive to maintain an open and transparent platform for content reviews while adhering to legal and ethical standards. However, we recognize that opinions may differ, and some individuals or groups may hold different views regarding certain aspects of our reviews.
We are committed to engaging in constructive dialogue and addressing concerns in a respectful and professional manner. We encourage users and visitors to reach out to us directly with any questions, feedback, or criticisms they may have. We will make every effort to respond promptly and transparently.
23. Disputes and Resolution:
In the event of any disputes arising from the content on VICESNOB.com, we prefer an amicable resolution and are open to dialogue, mediation, and other non-litigious methods of dispute resolution.
24. Protection of Brand Integrity and Legal Stance:
We understand that VICESNOB.com may attract various opinions and reactions. While we respect freedom of expression and constructive criticism, we will not tolerate defamation, harassment, or malicious actions against our brand or team.
- 2025 California Proposition 50
- California prop 50
- california prop 50 2025
- California prop 50 polling
- california prop 50 results
- california prop 50 vote
- california prop 50 yes or no
- California Proposition 50
- california proposition 50 polls
- california proposition 50 results
- prop 50 california
- Proposition 50 California
- yes on prop 50 california
